southchild

John at powerlineblog.com has this excellent commentary on photomanipulator Adnan Hajj, “Staging and Faking”

It’s important to distinguish between “faking” and “staging.” Reuters terminated its relationship with Hajj because two pictures were faked, i.e., digitally altered. It may well be that those are the only faked photos that Hajj submitted to Reuters. But, in my opinion, a great many of his pictures were staged, and, in my judgment, that is the more significant offense.

It appears to me that Hajj is a member of, or sympathizer with, Hezbollah. Many of the pictures he took for Reuters appear to be staged in cooperation with Hezbollah for use as Hezbollah propaganda. Thus, for example, as we noted over the weekend, the same woman was pictured two weeks apart, on each occasion allegedly bewailing the loss of her home in an Israeli air strike. Or the same wrecked building was shown on different occasions, allegedly damaged in two different bombings.

Like a repertory theater company in which actors play multiple roles, the same people tend to crop up repeatedly in Hajj’s pictures. We’ll have more to say about this over the coming days.

The question, obviously, is: How far did the staging go? Hajj took many of the iconic Qana photographs. Knowing what we now know about his techniques and his apparent relationship with, or sympathy to, Hezbollah can only make us wonder how far the terrorists’ claims about what happened in that village are real, and how far they may have been staged.

Again, this is just the tip of the iceberg.

***

Previous:
Second Doctored Photo Confirmed
Doctored Beirut Photo: the First Draft
Reuters Dumps Photographer/Manipulator
Yep, al-Reuters Doctored the Photo
Has Reuters been “Ratherized?”

This entry was posted on Monday, August 7th, 2006 at 3:48 pm and is filed under General, politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.